It is a story that how ideas changed around the nature the the atom. These are the note (and diagrams) i use as soon as I teach the atomic nature of matter to non-science majors. The ideal thing about this story is the it is a good example that science. Science (or scientists) build a model. If new evidence come along, the design gets changed.

You are watching: Which order of statements represents the historical development of the atomic model

I love this story. That is a story of how concepts changed about the nature that the atom. These room the note (and diagrams) i use once I teach the atom nature of issue to non-science majors. The best thing about this story is the it is a great example of science. Science (or scientists) develop a model. If new evidence come along, the version gets changed. There space several various other websites that describe all of this stuff, I will certainly list a couple at the end of this post.


Look in an intro, non-science majors textbook and also you will most likely see a picture like this of the atom. This model has actually some an excellent ideas in it, but overall it has actually some problems. The key (and not incorrect points) that this model are:

The atom is do of protons, neutrons and electronsMost of the space is taken increase by the area wherein the electron existThe protons and neutrons space in the main point of the atom - referred to as the nucleus

It constantly has to go back to the Greeks, doesn't it? Well, castle did do a lot of stuff. I understand they were yes, really scientists yet it is tho a an excellent place come start. Below is a picture of bust that Democritus.


In genuine life, the probably had actually color. Democritus is credited with comes up with the atom. The inquiry was, what would occur if you save taking miscellaneous (like a tree) and breaking right into smaller and also smaller pieces? would certainly it constantly be a item of a tree? could you store breaking it into smaller and smaller pieces? Democritus said that if you keep breaking it down, friend would acquire to a size that can no much longer be broken. This would certainly be the indivisible piece. In Greek, atomos = indivisible. Thus, the atom. (I recognize there is an ext to the Greeks, but I need a place to start)

Dalton's Model


I am no going to get in the experimental proof for Dalton's version of the atom, it's great stuff though. Let me simply state what Dalton said:

Stuff can be broken into facets (the things detailed on the routine table).Elements space atoms with different masses.Compounds space a combine of elements. You know, prefer water, salt or pizza.

Basically, Dalton just expanded on the Greek idea that the atom. An atom is a little things, and also there are different masses with different properties.

J. Jonah Jameson Thomson - (AKA J.J.)


Thomson played v cathode rays. These are just beams of electrons (but cathode beam sounds cooler). By having the beam communicate with electric and magnetic fields, Thomson to be able to identify the mass come charge proportion for an electron. So, from that he knew the the electron come from the atom, it had a an unfavorable charge and also a small mass. Below is the model that the proposed.


Thomson take it the idea the the atom and also tried to combine the proof for the electron. In this model, the electrons room the tiny things and the remainder of the stuff is some optimistic matter. This is generally called the plumb pudding model due to the fact that the electron are favor things in hopeful pudding.

Rutherford Scattering


Ernest Rutherford claimed one job "hey, i think I will shoot some stuff at atoms." ns am sure his wife said "oh, Ernie" (she probably referred to as him Ernie) "if it provides you happy to play v your little physics stuff, go ahead. Ns know how much you favor it." therefore he did. The shot some alpha corpuscle (which room really just the cell core of a helium atom) at part really slim gold foil. Right here is a diagram of his experiment.


If girlfriend shoot these positive alpha corpuscle at this optimistic pudding atom, castle should largely bounce off, right? Well, the is no what happened. Rutherford uncovered that many of castle went ideal through the foil. Some of them walk bounce back. How could that be if the plumb pudding design was correct? Rutherford's experiment motivated a change in the atomic model. If the hopeful alpha particles largely passed through the foil, but some bounced back. And if they currently knew that the electron was small and negative, climate the atom must have actually a little positive nucleus through the electrons roughly them.

Bohr Model


The version proposed through Niels Bohr is the one the you will see in a many introductory science texts. There space a lot of great ideas in this model, however it is no the one the agrees with every one of the present evidence. The model tries to make a connection between light and atoms.

Suppose girlfriend take some light and also you let various colors bending different amounts (think rainbow). This way, you could see what color are existing for different light sources. Right here are three various light sources.


Maybe the light from the light pear is what you would expect. These space the color of the rainbow. However, suppose you took part hydrogen gas and also excited it. Over there would just be details colors (only certain wavelengths) of light produced. If girlfriend shine light v some hydrogen gas, there will certainly be dark bands of irradiate at those same colors.

So, Bohr claimed that this colors of light in the hydrogen gas exchange mail to different energy levels the electron in hydrogen deserve to have. And this is the crucial to the Bohr model - electrons can ONLY be at specific energy level in the atom. This is stunner (at the very least it was crazy because that its time). Think around a earth orbiting the Sun. It have the right to be at any kind of energy level. In this case, over there is a gravitational force attracting the planet which produces orbit motion. This will certainly work anywhere in the solar system.

Early physicist thought of the electron in an atom a lot favor a earth orbiting the Sun. The key difference is that the electron (in the Bohr model) orbits as result of an electric interaction and not a gravitational interaction. Well, the other difference in the Bohr model is the the electron can not orbit (if the does orbit, which the doesn't) at any kind of distance and also any energy. Right here is the significance of the Bohr model.


The Bohr design depends top top a connection between the frequency the light and also the energy of the level change. If light of a frequency corresponding to the energy readjust interacts v the atom, the electron deserve to absorb the light and jump up a level. If one excited electron jumps under a level, it looses energy. The energy the electron loser becomes light with a frequency equivalent to a the adjust in energy.

The Bohr model can be fairly confusing to introduce students, yet the important point is that this model agrees with the complying with evidence.

Electrons are little and negative chargedProtons room in the nucleus with is little compared to the size of the atomFor a specific element, only specific frequencies (colors) of light are soaked up or emitted.
Schrodinger and also Heisenberg Model

There is a key point about the Bohr model that is no longer embraced in present models that the atom. In the Bohr model, the electrons are still assumed to orbit the nucleus similar to planets orbit the sun. Actually, this is something that we have the right to not say is true. The problem with atoms and electrons is that we humans other than them to obey the exact same rules together things prefer baseballs and planets. Actually, the rules space the same, yet baseballs and also planets follow the rules of quantum mechanics without united state humans also noticing.

It transforms out that we can't really say anything around the trajectory or place of electrons in one atom. What we can say is all around probabilities. We deserve to say what areas an electron is most likely to be. Here is a chart that could help. These space probability distributions because that the different energy level in one atom (from wikipedia)



Scientists build models. When brand-new evidence is collected, the models change.

See more: What Is 3 4 Of 8 ? What Is 3/4 Divided By 8


I completely forgot that ns made a video clip lecture for this exact same stuff. If you choose to listen and also watch rather of read, check this out.