You hear this quote from time to time, usually offered as some kind of creepy sound bite (a-la the Stephen King quick story of that name). What is the definition of this expression in its initial context?


“Allow” the small children (to approach me). “Suffer” means “permit” in this context.

You are watching: Suffer the little children meaning

Edit: The brand-new International Version has "When Jesus witnessed this, he to be indignant. He claimed to them, “Let the tiny children come to me, and do no hinder them, because that the kingdom the God belongs to such as these.”


“And they brought young kids to Him, the He must touch them: and also His disciples rebuked those that brought them. However when Jesus observed it, he was lot displeased, and also said unto them, experience the little children to come unto Me, and also forbid castle not: for of such is the kingdom the God” - mark 10:13-14

Jesus is telling his hands-on worker to enable the kids to come as much as him. It’s only used in the other way because we hardly ever use “suffer” to typical “allow” this days.


*
hibernicus:

“Allow” the tiny children (to approach me). “Suffer” way “permit” in this context.

That’s my knowledge too.

The original context is the Bible, an occurrence that is recorded in Matthew thing 19, mark chapter 10, and Luke chapter 18.

The regional Jews lug a bunch of little rugrats to check out Jesus, and also his Apostles shot to operation interference, figuring that the last thing the huge boss desires is to transaction with small tykes. After the children crowd about him Jesus autumn the ethical of the story: “Whosoever candlestick not obtain the kingdom the God as a little child, he shall not go into therein.”

I hope the that helps. Waves at Zsofia ~ above preview.


The phrase “tenants in ~ sufferance” involves mind – ‘suffer’ in the sense of allow, allow is tho a traditional usage. A tenant in ~ sufferance is simply someone that does not have a current lease, a person renting month come month. Our endure as renters has been that landlords sell the legally compelled lease for the first year, then proceed to collect the rental without offering to renew the lease. This means that each month’s rent payment buys girlfriend the best to occupy your dwelling location (apartment, house, etc.) for the month – with no guarantees beyond that month except as provided by law. You occupying it in ~ the sufferance of the landlord, that is, in exchange because that rent he patent you to live there, there is no an explicit created contract, the problems of the lease gift presumed to hold over top top a month-to-month basis till he or you chooses to change them – you have the right to move out on ideal notice, and owe that nothing (other than possible forfeiture of every or part of a damage security deposit); that can give you notice he’s raising the rent.

‘Suffer’ in this feeling works a lot choose ‘let’ – if friend say, “Let’s go to the beach,” your definition is, “I suggest we walk to the coast if you agree”; it’s not instructions to someone to approve permission come go, also though that sounds like it.

Similarly, ‘suffer’ has traditionally carried the meaning of ‘permit, allow’ – the much more common definition of ‘be in pain’ derives native the idea that you, or the civilization in general, is permit the human being suffering (in this sense) to continue to be in pain, quite than exhilaration to reduce it.


*
Polycarp:

‘Suffer’ in this sense works a lot favor ‘let’

Whereas ‘let’ supplied to average ‘prohibit’, as in ‘without permit or hindrance’ to typical ‘without any barriers’.


*
Derleth:

Whereas ‘let’ offered to typical ‘prohibit’, together in ‘without let or hindrance’ to average ‘without any barriers’.

So “Let the suffer!” would have virtually reversed in an interpretation over 300 years?

*


On a tangential note, I review an Ann Landers shaft a decade or more ago in which the letter-writer bemoaned the decline in parenting an abilities among the hoi polloi these days. The letter ended with: “And experience the children.”

What the writer meant, the course, to be “and the youngsters suffer.” somehow the use of pseudo-classical rhetoric and also genuine linguistic ignorance come stake out the ethical high floor really rubbed me the wrong way, and I still can’t view the expression “suffer the children” without wishing I’d composed a crackpot letter about it. No that it would certainly have accomplished anything, of course.


*
Gary_T:

Perhaps currently the meaning of the women’s suffrage activity will make more sense come you.

I believe that “suffrage” is unrelated to “suffering.”


I think that Gary T’s allude is that the “woman’s suffrage movement” describes “allow females movement”.


*
BobArrgh:

I think that Gary T’s allude is that the “woman’s suffrage movement” describes “allow females movement”.

Exactly.


There are probably locations of the scriptures belt whereby the King James variation of the i is quote in support of corporeal punishment in order to raise children to it is in God-fearin’ Christians. :rolleyes:


There room probably areas of the bible belt where the King James version of the passage is quote in assistance of corporeal penalty in order come raise kids to be God-fearin’ Christians. :rolleyes:

I don’t recognize why you will do think that and also I’m not seeing any kind of support because that it. The world here who understood the accurate definition were the human being who to be obviously acquainted with the paper definition of the verse. The civilization who usage it conveying the wrong an interpretation are the ones who take it the end of the Biblical context (Stephen King, presumably for intentional wordplay purposes, and also Ann Landers, most likely not among America’s leading exponents that the brand-new Testament).

The passage in the scriptures doesn’t do a little bit of sense using the various other meaning. “Punish the children to come unto to me?” appropriate after the disciples had been, well, trying to swat the children away but he rebuked them? Nah.

Nice gratuitous destruction at lock dumb fundy hillbillies though.


There space probably locations of the bible belt wherein the King James version of the passage is quote in support of corporeal penalty in order to raise youngsters to it is in God-fearin’ Christians. :rolleyes:

Nitpick: the “corporal” punishment.


Nitpick: it’s “corporal” punishment.

Yeah, yet Corporal punishment was supported to major Havoc and also then general Mayhem!

*


Exactly.

But Tom Tildrum was merely discussing that the 2 words have nearly nothing to carry out with each other in terms of origin. ‘Suffrage’ is from sub + fragor (under + ‘sound of approval’), and ‘suffer’ comes from sub + ferre (under + carry). ‘Suffrage’ as in ideal to vote have the right to be attested to 1787.


But Tom Tildrum was merely mentioning that the 2 words have nearly nothing to carry out with each other in regards to origin. ‘Suffrage’ is from sub + fragor (under + ‘sound that approval’), and ‘suffer’ comes from sub + ferre (under + carry). ‘Suffrage’ as in ideal to vote have the right to be attested to 1787.

See more: Directions To 6840 Hollywood Boulevard, Los Angeles, Ca, Hollywood Masonic Temple

Thanks because that pointing the out, and also my apologies to Tom Tildrum for not picking it up from his link. I had actually assumed, incorrectly, the the words come from the same root. Friend gentlemen have lessened my ignorance.